🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear Ruben Amorim could survive a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, undermining some of the club’s most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on the executive and appears to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated as one of the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind that United’s mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, it was the director , after being involved in the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when issued by a man of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, with no penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Power In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style to football “will be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his previous experience in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Who else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Above Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to join a club and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have these guys established? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint a coach who will adapt their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not responsible for the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face for a club they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who hired him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss them for playing excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and then bin them for taking excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.