🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart nuclear negotiations with the United States as long as it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations was effective, and revealed new appeals had been made by intermediaries to restart talks with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran could not yet authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to access bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Walking a Difficult Course

The foreign minister is walking a difficult route since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be operating from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out stronger in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Earlier Talks Abruptly Concluded

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that concluded with Donald Trump declaring the sites had been obliterated. Afterward, EU nations used their privilege to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was decided an local partnership with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Diplomats stated repeatedly they had secured an understanding with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Present Position

Tehran representatives stated the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in some form if discussions resume.

The US president in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iran's diplomats state they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from Washington either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been charged of non-responsiveness in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Position

In his remarks to the forum, designed to portray the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of global regulations, Araghchi stated the fortnight-long engagement showed the conflict could not be settled by armed force. He said the strikes began with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and collaboration, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Negotiations Continues the Final Answer

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled negotiations; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to dictate their will during the discussions. Negotiations can still be alive and stays the final solution to settle disagreements, but its requirements, guidelines and principles must be followed."

"If they address to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of respect and respect, they will obtain a response in the equivalent approach."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the struggle of restoration and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We acquired numerous insights from this war; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He added: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to eliminate, stays intact. The sites and machinery, if destroyed, will be restored; what is important is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but were unable to break. The nation of Iran have become more resilient, more united, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the face of this invasion."